Page 20 - 《环境工程技术学报》2022年第5期
P. 20

· 1376 ·                                环境工程技术学报                                         第 12 卷

            升,  但  CO D  和氨氮浓度仍较高,无法稳定达到Ⅳ类                          2021,762:143130.
            水质,下游入黄河泉眼山断面水质可达到Ⅲ类,但                            [  7  ]   WANG  Y  M,  ZHOU  X  D,  ENGEL  B.  Water  environment
                                                                    carrying  capacity  in  Bosten  Lake  Basin[J].  Journal  of  Cleaner
            CO 存在超标风险。
               D
                                                                    Production,2018,199:574-583.
                (2)清水河流域平水期水环境容               量  COD、氨氮
                                                              [  8  ]   王金南. 黄河流域生态保护和高质量发展战略思考[J]. 环境保
            和  T 分别   为  940.57、114.6 和  8.81 t/a,丰水期分别             护, 2020, 48(增刊1): 18-21.
                                    4
                P
            为  1 238.25、193.6 和  12.85 t/a。201 年清水河流域               WANG J N. A primary framework on protection of ecological
                                             8
                            0
            COD、氨氮    和  T 污染负荷入河量分别           为  15 661.10、        environment and realization of high-quality development for the
                          P
            1 670.2 和  784.50 t/a,污染负荷入河量远高于水环                      Yellow  River  Basin[J].  Environmental  Protection,  2020,
                   0
                                                                    48(Suppl 1): 18-21.
            境容量。
                                                              [  9  ]   ZHU  Y  C,  WANG  L  J,  ZHAO  X  Y,  et  al.  Accumulation  and
                (3)清水河流域不同控制单元污染特征存在差
                                                                    potential sources of heavy metals in soils of the Hetao area, Inner
            异:固原控制单元单位面积污染负荷最高,工业源污                                 Mongolia, China[J]. Pedosphere,2020,30(2):244-252.
            染与城镇生活源污染问题突出;中卫控制单元总污                            [10]   CHEN J, QIAN H, GAO Y Y, et al. Insights into hydrological
            染负荷入河量最高,城镇生活源污染问题较严重;吴                                 and hydrochemical processes in response to water replenishment
            忠控制单     元  T 单位面积污染负荷偏高,禽畜养殖污                          for  lakes  in  arid  regions[J].  Journal  of  Hydrology,2020 ,581:
                        P
                                                                    124386.
            染问题较大。
                                                              [11]   闵继胜, 孔祥智.我国农业面源污染问题的研究进展[J]. 华中
                (4)结合各控制单元的污染特征、水质目标提出
                                                                    农业大学学报(社会科学版),2016(2):59-66.
            有针对性的污染治理措施。固原控制单元应加强工                                  MIN J S, KONG X Z. Research development of agricultural non-
            业污水收集、处理与回用,同时要提高城镇污水收集                                 point  source  pollution  in  China[J].  Journal  of  Huazhong
            与处理能力;中卫控制单元应重点关注城镇管网、污                                 Agricultural University (Social Sciences Edition),2016(2):59-
            水处理厂建设与改造,提高深度净化能力;吴忠控制                                 66.
                                                              [12]   ZHANG Y, LIU W X, CAI Y, et al. Decoupling analysis of water
            单元应在规模化养殖场推行禽畜粪便集中处理、回
                                                                    use and economic development in arid region of China: based on
            用设施。
                                                                    quantity  and  quality  of  water  use[J].  Science  of  the  Total
                                                                    Environment,2021,761:143275.
            参考文献                                              [13]   和志国, 张华, 暴路敏, 等.宁夏清水河流域生态水量确定及保
            [  1  ]   JIANG Y, LIU C M, HAO S N, et al. A framework to develop a  障措施浅析[J]. 中国水利,2019(3):25-27.
                  watershed  pollution  load  model  for  semiarid  and  semihumid  HE  Z  G,  ZHANG  H,  BAO  L  M,  et  al.  Analysis  on  ecological
                  areas[J]. Journal of Hydrology,2019,579:124179.   water  flow  in  the  Qingshuihe  River  Basin  of  Ningxia  and
            [  2  ]   邱小琮, 王德全, 尹娟, 等.宁夏农业面源污染及其影响因子解               safeguarding measures[J]. China Water Resources,2019(3):25-
                  析[J]. 水土保持学报,2012,26(5):190-194.                  27.
                  QIU X C, WANG D Q, YIN J, et al. Analysis of agriculture non-  [14]   CHEN  D  J,  HU  M  P,  GUO  Y,  et  al.  Reconstructing  historical
                  point  source  pollution  and  its  influence  factors  in  Ningxia[J].  changes in phosphorus inputs to rivers from point and nonpoint
                  Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,26(5):190-194.  sources  in  a  rapidly  developing  watershed  in  Eastern  China,
            [  3  ]   CAREY  R  O,  HOCHMUTH  G  J,  MARTINEZ  C  J,  et  al.  1980-2010[J]. Science of the Total Environment,2015,533:196-
                  Evaluating nutrient impacts in urban watersheds: challenges and  204.
                  research  opportunities[J].  Environmental  Pollution,2013 ,173:  [15]   CHEN Y P, FU B J, ZHAO Y, et al. Sustainable development in
                  138-149.                                          the  Yellow  River  Basin:  issues  and  strategies[J].  Journal  of
            [  4  ]   YAN  R  H,  GAO  Y  N,  LI  L  L,  et  al.  Estimation  of  water  Cleaner Production,2020,263:121223.
                  environmental  capacity  and  pollution  load  reduction  for  urban  [16]   李颖曼, 焦鹏, 张晓华, 等.宁夏清水河流域近60年降水量及入
                  lakeside  of  Lake  Taihu,  Eastern  China[J]. Ecological  黄沙量变化[J]. 水土保持研究,2021,28(2):184-189.
                  Engineering,2019,139:105587.                      LI Y M, JIAO P, ZHANG X H, et al. Change of precipitation and
            [  5  ]   de PAULA FILHO F J, de SÁ SAMPAIO A D, MENEZES J M C,  sediment  of  Qingshui  River  Basin  of  Ningxia  in  recent  60
                  et al. Land uses, nitrogen and phosphorus estimated fluxes in a  years[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2021,28(2):
                  Brazilian semi-arid watershed[J]. Journal of Arid Environments,  184-189.
                  2019,163:41-49.                             [17]   陈世贵.宁夏山区水库污染水体生态修复研究[J]. 人民黄河,
            [  6  ]   TRANG C T T, THANH T, THANH T D, et al. Assessment of  2020,42(12):66-69.
                  the environmental carrying capacity of pollutants in Tam Giang-  CHEN S G. Study on ecological restoration of polluted water in
                  Cau Hai Lagoon (Viet Nam) and solutions for the environment  reservoirs in Ningxia mountainous areas[J]. Yellow River,2020,
                  protection  of  the  lagoon[J].  Science  of  the  Total  Environment,  42(12):66-69.
   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25