Page 198 - 《环境工程技术学报》2022年第5期
P. 198

· 1554 ·                                环境工程技术学报                                         第 12 卷

                  pollution   and   countermeasures[J].   Environment   and  [19]   PAL M, CHAKRABORTTY S, NAYAK J, et al. Removing toxic
                  Development,2020,32(10):38-39.                    contaminants   from   groundwater   by   graphene   oxide
            [  8  ]   SHAJI  E,  SANTOSH  M,  SARATH  K  V,  et  al.  Arsenic  nanocomposite  in  a  membrane  module  under  response  surface
                  contamination of groundwater: a global synopsis with focus on  optimization[J].  International  Journal  of  Environmental  Science
                  the  Indian  Peninsula[J].  Geoscience  Frontiers,2021 ,12 (3 ) :  and Technology,2019,16(8):4583-4594.
                  101079.                                     [20]   CHOWDHURY T, ZHANG L, ZHANG J Q, et al. Removal of
            [  9  ]   生态环境部. 2018中国生态环境状况公报[A/OL]. (2019-05-        arsenic(Ⅲ)  from  aqueous  solution  using  metal  organic
                  29)[2021-06-02].https://www.mee.gov.cn/ywdt/tpxw/201905/  framework-graphene  oxide  nanocomposite[J]. Nanomaterials
                  t20190529_704841.shtml.                           (Basel, Switzerland),2018,8(12):1062.
            [10]   曾祥裕, 张春燕.印度应对水危机的政策措施评析[J]. 南亚研            [21]   GIFFORD  M,  HRISTOVSKI  K,  WESTERHOFF  P.  Ranking
                 究季刊,2015(2):84-93.                                 traditional  and  nano-enabled  sorbents  for  simultaneous  removal
                 ZENG X Y, ZHANG C Y. Water crisis: the Indian response[J].  of arsenic and chromium from simulated groundwater[J]. Science
                 South Asian Studies Quarterly,2015(2):84-93.       of the Total Environment,2017,601/602:1008-1014.
            [11]   环 境 保 护 部 .  2016中 国 环 境 状 况 公 报 [A/OL].  (2017-06-  [22]   CHOWDHURY  S  R,  YANFUL  E  K.  Arsenic  and  chromium
                 05)[2021-06-02].https://www.mee.gov.cn/gkml/sthjbgw/qt/  removal  by  mixed  magnetite-maghemite  nanoparticles  and  the
                 201706/t20170605_415442.htm.                       effect  of  phosphate  on  removal[J].  Journal  of  Environmental
            [12]   SIK E, KOBYA M, DEMIRBAS E, et al. Combined effects of  Management,2010,91(11):2238-2247.
                 co-existing  anions  on  the  removal  of  arsenic  from  groundwater  [23]   GUZMÁN  A,  NAVA  J  L,  COREÑO  O,  et  al.  Arsenic  and
                 by  electrocoagulation  process:  optimization  through  response  fluoride removal from groundwater by electrocoagulation using a
                 surface  methodology[J].  Journal  of  Environmental  Chemical  continuous filter-press reactor[J]. Chemosphere,2016,144:2113-
                 Engineering,2017,5(4):3792-3802.                   2120.
            [13]   MOHORA E, RONČEVIĆ S, AGBABA J, et al. Arsenic removal  [24]   NEMADE  P  D,  KADAM  A  M,  SHANKAR  H  S.  Removal  of
                 from   groundwater   by   horizontal-flow   continuous  iron,  arsenic  and  coliform  bacteria  from  water  by  novel
                 electrocoagulation  (EC)  as  a  standalone  process[J].  Journal  of  constructed  soil  filter  system[J].  Ecological  Engineering,2009,
                 Environmental Chemical Engineering,2018,6(1):512-519.  35(8):1152-1157.
            [14]   CASTAÑEDA  L  F,  COREÑO  O,  NAVA  J  L.  Arsenic  and  [25]   YANG  L,  LI  X  K,  CHU  Z  R,  et  al.  Distribution  and  genetic
                 hydrated silica removal from groundwater by electrocoagulation  diversity  of  the  microorganisms  in  the  biofilter  for  the
                 using  an  up-flow  reactor  in  a  serpentine  array[J].  Journal  of  simultaneous  removal  of  arsenic,  iron  and  manganese  from
                 Environmental Chemical Engineering,2019,7(5):103353.  simulated  groundwater[J].  Bioresource  Technology,2014 ,156:
            [15]   GUO H M, STÜBEN D, BERNER Z, et al. Adsorption of arsenic  384-388.
                 species  from  water  using  activated  siderite-hematite  column  [26]   SHAKYA  A  K,  GHOSH  P  K.  Concurrent  removal  of  nitrate,
                 filters[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials,2008,151(2/3):628-  arsenic and iron from simulated and real-life groundwater to meet
                 635.                                               drinking  water  standards:  effects  of  operational  and
            [16]   LI F L, GUO H M, ZHAO K, et al. Modeling transport of arsenic  environmental   parameters[J].   Journal   of   Environmental
                 through  modified  granular  natural  siderite  filters  for  arsenic  Management,2019,235:9-18.
                 removal[J]. Geoscience Frontiers,2019,10(5):1755-1764.  [27]   THAKUR L S, MONDAL P. Simultaneous arsenic and fluoride
            [17]   CHENG Y, ZHANG S S, HUANG T L, et al. Arsenite removal  removal   from   synthetic   and   real   groundwater   by
                 from  groundwater  by  iron-manganese  oxides  filter  media:  electrocoagulation  process:  parametric  and  cost  evaluation[J].
                 behavior and mechanism[J]. Water Environment Research,2019,  Journal of Environmental Management,2017,190:102-112.
                 91(6):536-545.                               [28]   POONIA T, SINGH N, GARG M C. Contamination of arsenic,
            [18]   WU K, WANG M, LI A Z, et al. The enhanced As(Ⅲ) removal  chromium  and  fluoride  in  the  Indian  groundwater:  a  review,
                 by  Fe-Mn-Cu  ternary  oxide  via  synergistic  oxidation:  meta-analysis and cancer risk assessment[J]. International Journal
                 performances  and  mechanisms[J].  Chemical  Engineering  of Environmental Science and Technology,2021,18(9):2891-
                 Journal,2021,406:126739.                           2902. ◇
   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203